For our final session to complete our installation we wanted to experiment with different elements and see if they would make improvements on our piece or were better to be left out of the piece. The first thing we wanted to change was the head as it was the only part of the piece that we liked the least. We first added tape to the arms so that it could be easier to define the different characters within the painting that are being represented in the installation. We could have used paper but it didn't fold well around the fish-wire and we couldn't remove the fish-wire so we used the more mold-able tape instead.
We tried a real person's head first to see if it would work or add anything to the installation and if live elements would work within our piece. I personally think it looked quite effective as it added a creepy vibe to the installation as well as further cementing the idea that it is a male being slain because you can clearly see that the model is male. However the subject was in a uncomfortable position and it contrasted with the rest of the piece as it was the only live element of it, so we scrapped that notion.
We decided to swap the previous wire sword and instead ue a clear plastic sword so that it would still be a element of the piece but would also blend into the background so that the focus remains on the arms and not on a super detailed, interesting sword. What I like about the sword is that because of the simple yet recognisable shape it instantly becomes apart of the installation thanks its minimalistic appearance that somewhat reflects on to the arms as well. I think this will become a new permanent element of the piece.
Here we tried a upside down plastic skull as the "head" of the piece as we felt it would relate to the theme of death as well as be recognisable as the head element. The shape we found to be the most interesting about the skull since it created a load of intricate and contrasting shadows as well as serving as a natural element within the piece. However it isn't as recognisable when its facing away from the viewer so maybe we should try to get it facing front and the right way up even though its not consistent with the painting. These next two images were tests in the lighting of the installation to see if the installation looked more effective with the lighting in different places. We settled with the light on the right side of the installation pointing upwards to emphasise the arms and draw away attention from the skull.
Here is the skull facing forwards and the right way up as we had previously mentioned how we wanted the skull to be positioned. We believe that this is the most effective position for the skull as it emphasises the theme of death as well as being more visually appealing then strikingly accurate to the original painting.
Here we tried some red lighting on the installation to see if it would be more effective if it it had a red overtone across the piece. What I like about the red lighting is how it emphasises the violent nature of the themes within the painting and adds a bit more colour to the piece then say with a normal clear light. However it also takes away the subtlety of the violence within the installation and I think it fits too closely with the themes of the original painting which we want to avoid so that it could be interpreted in different way other then the painting.
Here is the final composition of the installation. I think overall this experiment in installations was quite successful as it taught our group to work together and think outside of the box, like when we decided upon the floating arm motif, and then we all constructed an arm each so we could finish faster. If I was to do this production again I would like to draw up a design sheet next time so we have clearer goals to achieve and I would have liked more time to explore the possibilities of different materials so we can produce a higher quality product.